Pro (Yes)
Pro
"Biden will establish ARPA-C, a new, cross-agency Advanced Research Projects Agency focused on climate. This initiative will target affordable, game-changing technologies to help America achieve our 100% clean energy target... [including] small modular nuclear reactors at half the construction cost of today’s reactors...
Identify the future of nuclear energy. To address the climate emergency threatening our communities, economy, and national security, we must look at all low- and zero-carbon technologies. That’s why Biden will support a research agenda through ARPA-C to look at issues, ranging from cost to safety to waste disposal systems, that remain an ongoing challenge with nuclear power today."
Source: Joe Biden, "Climate," joebiden.com (accessed Nov. 12, 2019)
Pro
"Yes. Reducing pollution worldwide requires cost-efficient, safe, zero-emission energy sources like nuclear power plants."
Source: Communication from the Jorgensen campaign to ProCon.org on Aug. 26, 2020
Pro
"Today, I am proudly announcing six brand-new initiatives to propel this new era of American energy dominance. First, we will begin to revive and expand our nuclear energy sector — which I’m so happy about — which produces clean, renewable and emissions-free energy. A complete review of U.S. nuclear energy policy will help us find new ways to revitalize this crucial energy resource."
Source: Donald Trump, "Remarks by President Trump at the Unleashing American Energy Event," whitehouse.gov, June 29, 2017
|
Con (No)
Con
"A rapid phaseout of nuclear power. Nukes are not clean energy. They are not cost-effective. They are subject to catastrophic accidents. No nukes."
Source: Howie Hawkins, "Overview: The Ecosocialist Green New Deal Budget," howiehawkins.us (accessed June 24, 2020)
|