Last updated on: 5/5/2020 9:17:44 AM PST
Should Federal Welfare Benefits Have Work Requirements?
Federal welfare programs include Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly known as food stamps). The government spent about $31 billion on TANF and $68 billion on SNAP in fiscal year 2018.
Sources: |
Pro (Yes)
Pro
"We need to phase out welfare, which has failed disadvantaged Americans.
From 1959 to 1969, the poverty rate was nearly cut in half while government did little to address poverty. However, after the war on poverty was fully implemented in the early seventies, progress stopped. Fifty years of federal anti-poverty programs – zero impact. Government anti-poverty programs don’t work. The real cure for poverty is a vibrant economy that generates plentiful jobs and high wages, combined with an affordable cost of living. As President, I will work to eliminate policies that cripple economic growth. I will give special attention to regulations driving up the cost of housing and health care, as well as those creating barriers to creating new businesses or entering professions. Finally, I will work to repeal laws and regulations that prevent individuals and charitable organizations from helping those in need, including free healthcare clinics. Until we have successfully replaced failed welfare programs with a vibrant economy, we should require beneficiaries to work, and make exceptions for situations such as legitimate disability." Source: Communication from the Jorgensen campaign to ProCon.org on Aug. 26, 2020 [Editor's Note: The Jorgensen campaign self-categorized as not clearly pro or con. However, the following portion of the answer puts Jorgensen in the pro category: "Until we have successfully replaced failed welfare programs with a vibrant economy, we should require beneficiaries to work, and make exceptions for situations such as legitimate disability." ]
Pro
"[W]elfare reform — I see it and I’ve talked to people. I know people, they work three jobs and they live next to somebody who doesn’t work at all. And the person who’s not working at all and has no intention of working at all is making more money and doing better than the person that’s working his and her ass off. And it’s not going to happen. Not going to happen."
Source: White House, "Remarks by President Trump on Tax Reform," whitehouse.gov, Nov. 29, 2017 [Editor's Note: On Apr. 10, 2018, Trump signed "Executive Order Reducing Poverty in America by Promoting Opportunity and Economic Mobility." The order includes that "the Federal Government must first enforce work requirements that are required by law. It must also strengthen requirements that promote obtaining and maintaining employment in order to move people to independence," in order to prevent "delayed economic independence, perpetuated poverty, and weakened family bonds." Source:
|
Con (No)
|
Now Not Clearly Pro or Con
[Editor's Note: In response to a CBS News article about the Trump administration's expansion of work requirements for SNAP (food stamp) benefits, Biden tweeted on Dec. 26, 2019, "Donald Trump is cutting food assistance for 700,000 people, but somehow found $1.4 billion for his sham of a border wall. This administration is morally bankrupt.]
Source: [Editor's Note: Biden previously expressed a PRO opinion on this question. Read Biden's former position on whether federal welfare benefits should have work requirements.]
Not Clearly Pro or Con
"Welfare reform should also include a guaranteed job for all those who want to work...
The TANF program should be reformed in a number of ways: more emphasis on job creation, including transitional jobs that include education and training; stronger support for those making the transition to work, such as universal child care and health care; expanded access to job and skills training; expanded access to both basic education (e.g., GED, English as Second Language, adult literacy) and college; and better assessment of individuals' barriers to employment. If work participation is to be mandated, the number of required hours must be dramatically scaled back to reflect the reality that almost all of the participants are engaged in child rearing activities. In addition, the safety net, starting with higher benefits, should be dramatically increased for those unable to work, starting with those who have disabilities and/or who are caregivers for other family members." Source: Howie Hawkins, "Welfare Reform," howiehawkins.com, 2006 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CITE THIS PAGE
Who is the author? |
|||||||||||||||||||
SHARE |
READER FAVORITES
TRANSLATE into 100+ Languages and Dialects ProCon.org is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit public charity.
Contact Us
233 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 200
Santa Monica, CA 90401 © 2024 ProCon.org
All rights reserved Contact Us
ProCon/Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.
325 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 200 Chicago, Illinois 60654 USA © 2024 Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.
All rights reserved |